Monday, March 9, 2009

my review of zak snyder's 'watchmen'


i hadta take that photo with my foot!

i'm way too tired to tell you everything that was wrong with it.

here's what was right: the comedian.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yeah ... Josh and I saw it and it was pretty lame ...
certainly no "Dark Knight" ...

Love ya

Dad

itspaulbriz said...

dad, you've never read the book. nor, i reckon, has my misbegotten brother, Joshua James Bartholomew Brisbin III.

therefore? your opinion has been rendered VOID.

ally?

*YOUR* opinion has been inspected, filed, and will await further review upon *MY* viewing of the film.

...

that is all.

obsquatch said...

I really liked it and thought it stayed very true to the books, of course they had to leave out some sub-plots but i thought the main characters were well portrayed. I didn't mind the twist, infact it seemed a well though out substitution. Sometimes the acting was a bit off, but it always is in comic book movies. I could have used a little less shiny blue cock though. I kept catching myself looking at it. Does that make me gay?

ally said...

roger, that's not what makes you gay.

obsquatch said...

Do you feel like telling me what you didn't like about it? Or at least explaining why it was so bad that you needed to use your feet to show how many thumbs down you wanted to give this movie? Or at least tell me what makes me gay? Oh, it's the dick sucking, isn't it. Meh. I thought it was a phase.

The word that I had to type to post this message was hotale.

Hotale: N. A hotel that boosts the morale of it's visitors.

ally said...

yeah yeah yeah, we can duke it out next time we meat IRL. (that means 'in real life' in n3rd talk)